NEWS

According to the General Court, the figurative mark “Compton” is registrable as trademark

General Court judgement of 28/02/2024, T 747/22 und T 746/22 – “Compton”

 Contents

Compton and Gangsta–Rap

The city of Compton is known for being the origin of West Coast gangsta–rap. “Compton” was registered as a figurative mark in October 2016 for, among other things, travel and carry–on suitcases and clothing. In 2020, New York–based Marketing & Media International GmbH filed an application for a declaration of invalidity with the EUIPO on the grounds that “Compton” is a geographical designation. The city of Compton is located near Los Angeles (USA) and is closely associated with the history of hip hop culture and rap music. The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO ruled in favor of a geographical designation. The trademark proprietor, the Swiss company BIW Invest – known for brands such as Urban Classics, Mister Tee, etc. appealed against this decision to the General Court to have this decision overturned. 

City of Compton less recognized by customers after all

The central question was whether the relevant public would perceive “Compton” as a geographical designation. The Board of Appeal focused on the purchasers of streetwear articles or those with an interest in gangsta–rap – but not on the wider public interested in street fashion. According to the applicant, the city of Compton is known to purchasers interested in gangsta–rap.

EGC decided that it is  the general public but not just a specialized group of customers which has to be taken into account considering the goods claimed. However, no significant part of the general public was aware of the city of “Compton” at the application date.

To the point

Not every geographical designation is a descriptive feature that prevents it from being registered as a trademark. The correct determination of the relevant public is of great importance in trademark law.

Source: European Union

MORE NEWS

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.
Trademark Law

No protection for Jägermeister’s well–known figurative trade mark “Hirschkopf”

Even for well–known trademarks, protection under trade mark law is only possible in so far as the opposing signs have at least a certain similarity.

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

The Wiesbaden Regional Court held that advertising with outdated, significantly higher strike-through prices is misleading and violates the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the UWG. Consumers understand crossed-out prices as the most recently charged price; if the reference price does not reflect that and there is no clear explanation, the ad suggests an overstated discount. Therefore, strike-through prices must be tied to the price immediately charged before the reduction.
Trademark Law

“Bayern Bazi” Lacks Distinctiveness

The German Federal Patent Court upheld the refusal of the word mark “Bayern Bazi.” The combination of a geographical indication (“Bayern”) and a dialect term (“Bazi”) is perceived as a purely descriptive message (“particularly Bavarian/from Bavaria”), not as an indicator of commercial origin. Prior registrations did not help because the sign lacks a distinctive, imaginative character.
IP

Russian Sanctions: Intellectual Property Rights Also Affected

Article 12g of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine “No Russia Clause”
Trademark Law

Virtual Goods in the Spotlight – The General Court Issues a Landmark Ruling on Whether a Trademark for Virtual Goods Possesses Distinctive Character

Virtual Goods in the Spotlight – The General Court Issues a Landmark Ruling on Whether a Trademark for Virtual Goods Possesses Distinctive Character.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München