NEWS

According to the General Court, the figurative mark “Compton” is registrable as trademark

General Court judgement of 28/02/2024, T 747/22 und T 746/22 – “Compton”

 Contents

Compton and Gangsta–Rap

The city of Compton is known for being the origin of West Coast gangsta–rap. “Compton” was registered as a figurative mark in October 2016 for, among other things, travel and carry–on suitcases and clothing. In 2020, New York–based Marketing & Media International GmbH filed an application for a declaration of invalidity with the EUIPO on the grounds that “Compton” is a geographical designation. The city of Compton is located near Los Angeles (USA) and is closely associated with the history of hip hop culture and rap music. The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO ruled in favor of a geographical designation. The trademark proprietor, the Swiss company BIW Invest – known for brands such as Urban Classics, Mister Tee, etc. appealed against this decision to the General Court to have this decision overturned. 

City of Compton less recognized by customers after all

The central question was whether the relevant public would perceive “Compton” as a geographical designation. The Board of Appeal focused on the purchasers of streetwear articles or those with an interest in gangsta–rap – but not on the wider public interested in street fashion. According to the applicant, the city of Compton is known to purchasers interested in gangsta–rap.

EGC decided that it is  the general public but not just a specialized group of customers which has to be taken into account considering the goods claimed. However, no significant part of the general public was aware of the city of “Compton” at the application date.

To the point

Not every geographical designation is a descriptive feature that prevents it from being registered as a trademark. The correct determination of the relevant public is of great importance in trademark law.

Source: European Union

MORE NEWS
Trademark Law

AI & Branding: Europe’s brand work between “back to basics” and a GenAI leap

European marketing teams are putting branding back at the top for 2026—while GenAI is still rarely scaled broadly. At the same time, DPMA/EUIPO figures show sustained trademark activity.
Trademark Law

German Federal Court of Justice: No title protection for names of fictional film characters without an independent “life” – “Moneypenny”

The BGH clarifies: A fictional character’s name may in principle enjoy title protection—but only if the character itself is perceived as an independently “designatable” work (part) under trademark law. For “Moneypenny”, the court found insufficient individualisation and no sufficient detachment from the underlying work.
Trademark Law

GPTO enables EU-wide protection of regional products – new rights for craft and industrial goods

DPMA enables protection of geographical indications for industrial products such as knives, porcelain & watches – new EU regulation now in force.
Copyright / Design Law

Copyright protection for utilitarian objects: same test as for other works

The CJEU has held that utilitarian objects and works of applied art are protected by copyright under the same originality standard as any other category of works. It rejects a stricter threshold for everyday objects and provides detailed guidance on how national courts must assess originality and infringement in this context.
Copyright

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

The Wiesbaden Regional Court held that advertising with outdated, significantly higher strike-through prices is misleading and violates the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the UWG. Consumers understand crossed-out prices as the most recently charged price; if the reference price does not reflect that and there is no clear explanation, the ad suggests an overstated discount. Therefore, strike-through prices must be tied to the price immediately charged before the reduction.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München