NEWS

AI & Branding: Europe’s brand work between “back to basics” and a GenAI leap

 Contents

European marketing teams are putting branding back at the top for 2026—while GenAI is still rarely scaled broadly. At the same time, DPMA/EUIPO figures show sustained trademark activity.

Background

A McKinsey study describes a clear “back to basics” shift in Europe: branding is the number one priority for 2026 in marketing organizations. At the same time, it highlights a gap in broad adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) in marketing—despite expectations of rising investments.

What the study highlights for Europe

Branding becomes the most important priority for 2026 as a response to uncertainty and increasing competition for trust, attention, and differentiation. GenAI, by contrast, ranks far down the overall priority list (17 out of 20)—even though 50% of CMOs count “GenAI-enabled marketing” among the top three fastest-growing investment areas.

Notably, 94% of surveyed European marketing organizations rate their GenAI capabilities as low to moderate. Where GenAI is scaled consistently, “GenAI leaders” report an average 22% efficiency gain—primarily driven by scaling across functions and workflows rather than isolated pilots.

What DPMA and EUIPO figures signal about trademark relevance

The strategic importance of trademarks is also reflected in official figures: at the end of 2024, the DPMA register contained 897,701 trademarks. In 2024, 80,365 trademark applications (national and international) were filed; 77,221 of these were national applications (+2.6%). Within national filings, 6,916 came from abroad (+21.7%).

At EU level, EUIPO recorded 180,447 trademark applications in 2024 (+2.7% vs. 2023); 22,080 applications came from Germany (nearly unchanged).

How this matters for companies, brands, and marketing teams

The combination of (1) branding as the top priority and (2) rising trademark activity suggests that brand management remains a central competitive factor. At the same time, the study indicates many organizations still do not treat GenAI as a core lever for brand work—despite measurable effects among “leaders.”

In practice, brand strategy and creativity remain core, but efficiency, personalization, and scaling are increasingly determined by GenAI-enabled processes. Moving from pilots to standardized workflows, clear governance, and a solid data/tech foundation can make brand work faster, more consistent, and more cost-efficient.

To the point

  • In Europe, branding is the top priority for 2026—as a response to competition for trust and differentiation.
  • GenAI is seen as an investment area, yet overall it is still ranked low on the priority list.
  • Most organizations rate their GenAI capabilities as low to moderate (94%).
  • Impact comes mainly from scaling across workflows (leaders: avg. 22% efficiency gains).
  • DPMA/EUIPO figures underline: trademarks remain highly relevant and active.

 

Source:
McKinsey & Company: “Past forward: The modern rethinking of marketing’s core” (PDF, study/report).
https://www.dpma.de/digitaler_jahresbericht/2024/jb24_de/marken.html
https://www.dpma.de/jb2024/
https://www.dpma.de/dpma/veroeffentlichungen/statistiken/marken/index.html
https://www.dpma.de/digitaler_jahresbericht/2024/jb24_en/trade_marks.html
https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/news-and-events/publications/annual-report

 

MORE NEWS
Trademark Law

BGH “Mehmet Efendi”: No exhaustion from placing goods on the market in Turkey – association agreement does not extend the EEA

The BGH confirms: Placing EU trade mark goods on the market in Turkey does not trigger exhaustion within the EEA. The EEC–Turkey association framework does not extend the territorial scope of exhaustion; parallel imports into the EEA can be prohibited without the proprietor’s consent.
Trademark Law

BGH “LA BIOSTHETIQUE”: German courts have jurisdiction for targeted online advertising – supplier disclosure may be disproportionate

The BGH aligns international jurisdiction for online trademark infringement with the target market: what matters is where the addressed consumers/traders are located—not the server location or the advertiser’s seat. It also held that disclosure of suppliers/prior owners may exceptionally be disproportionate where the infringement lies solely in the presentation of exhausted goods.
Trade Secrets

CJEU: Infringing “possession” covers stock held abroad—and also indirect possession

The CJEU clarifies that trade mark owners may prohibit “possession” under Art. 10(3)(b) Directive 2015/2436 even where goods are stocked in another Member State—if intended for offering/placing on the market in the protection state. “Possession” also includes indirect control (supervisory/managerial authority).
Trademark Law

General Court: “Eco” may still shape the overall impression despite being descriptive

The General Court clarifies that descriptive elements can still matter in the comparison of signs—especially when placed at the beginning and drawing attention due to their length/position.
AI / Personality Rights

LG Hamburg: AI-generated X post remains attributable to the account operator

The Regional Court of Hamburg held that a continuing defamatory false statement on X remains unlawful under the law of statements even if the post was generated by AI. The account operator can be held responsible for the published content.
AI

Cologne Higher Regional Court: Meta may provisionally use public Facebook and Instagram data for AI training

The Cologne Higher Regional Court rejected an interim injunction against Meta’s announced use of publicly shared Facebook and Instagram data for AI training. In its summary assessment, the court considered the processing likely lawful, in particular on the basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München