NEWS

According to the General Court, the figurative mark “Compton” is registrable as trademark

General Court judgement of 28/02/2024, T 747/22 und T 746/22 – “Compton”

 Contents

Compton and Gangsta–Rap

The city of Compton is known for being the origin of West Coast gangsta–rap. “Compton” was registered as a figurative mark in October 2016 for, among other things, travel and carry–on suitcases and clothing. In 2020, New York–based Marketing & Media International GmbH filed an application for a declaration of invalidity with the EUIPO on the grounds that “Compton” is a geographical designation. The city of Compton is located near Los Angeles (USA) and is closely associated with the history of hip hop culture and rap music. The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO ruled in favor of a geographical designation. The trademark proprietor, the Swiss company BIW Invest – known for brands such as Urban Classics, Mister Tee, etc. appealed against this decision to the General Court to have this decision overturned. 

City of Compton less recognized by customers after all

The central question was whether the relevant public would perceive “Compton” as a geographical designation. The Board of Appeal focused on the purchasers of streetwear articles or those with an interest in gangsta–rap – but not on the wider public interested in street fashion. According to the applicant, the city of Compton is known to purchasers interested in gangsta–rap.

EGC decided that it is  the general public but not just a specialized group of customers which has to be taken into account considering the goods claimed. However, no significant part of the general public was aware of the city of “Compton” at the application date.

To the point

Not every geographical designation is a descriptive feature that prevents it from being registered as a trademark. The correct determination of the relevant public is of great importance in trademark law.

Source: European Union

more NEWS
Copyright

Contrary opinion of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf and the Regional Court of Cologne regarding the production of photos of photo wallpapers and their publication.

The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf denies copyright infringement by taking and publishing photos of photo wallpapers - the Regional Court of Cologne is not sharing this view in its two most recent decisions.
Copyright

TikTok publishes films without authorisation – no release from liability according to the Act on the Copyright Liability of Online Content Sharing Service Providers (UrhDaG)

Delaying tactics in the negotiations with the copyright owner do not comply with the licence obligation under Section 4 UrhDaG (Act on the Copyright Liability of Online Content Sharing Service Providers).
Copyright

Birkenstock fails before the Higher Regional Court of Cologne in copyright dispute regarding “Arizona” and “Gizeh” sandals

Birkenstocks do not fulfil the requirements of a work of applied art within the meaning of §§ 2 par. 1 No. 4, par. 2 UrhG (Act on Copyright and Related Rights), because they are not artistically designed beyond their form - which is dictated by their function.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München