NEWS

Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf Confirms Legal Protection for McCain’s Smiley-Shaped Potato Products

OLG Düsseldorf Judgment of December 19, 2024, I-20 U 33/24

 Contents

Background of the Proceedings

The Applicant, part of a globally operating food conglomerate, has been marketing smiley-shaped frozen potato specialties in Germany for more than 25 years. In addition, it is the proprietor of a three-dimensional EU Trade Mark (registration number 001801166) covering “pre-fried potato croquettes and mashed potato products, frozen” (Class 29).

In October 2017, the Respondent exhibited a similar potato product in the form of various smiling faces at the “Anuga” trade fair.

Im Oktober 2017 stellte die Antragsgegnerin auf der Fachmesse „Anuga“ ein ähnliches Kartoffelprodukt in Form verschiedener lächelnder Gesichter aus. 

Decision of the Düsseldorf Regional Court

By way of a preliminary injunction dated November 10, 2017, the Düsseldorf Regional Court prohibited the Respondent from offering, promoting, distributing, or otherwise placing these products on the market. In its judgment of January 10, 2024, the Regional Court confirmed that preliminary injunction.

Appeal Proceedings before the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf

On December 19, 2024, the 20th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf dismissed the Respondent’s appeal, thereby affirming the first-instance decision. Presiding Judge at the Higher Regional Court, Erfried Schüttpelz, held that the marketing of smiley-shaped potato products remains prohibited.

Reasoning of the Senate: Relevant Trade Circles Recognize the Unusual Shape as Indicating Origin

According to the Court, the smiley shape is used in the course of trade in a manner that constitutes trade mark use. Given that there are few providers of facially shaped frozen potato products on the market, the relevant trade circles perceive this distinctive shape as an indication of commercial origin. In particular, commercial customers familiar with the market—such as buyers for fast food chains or canteens—associate the smiley shape with the Applicant.

The fact that the Respondent’s products feature its own word/picture mark does not change this conclusion. Furthermore, there is a likelihood of confusion, as the products are offered in the same category of goods, the smiley shape has average distinctiveness, and the overall similarity between the signs is high.

Die Kennzeichnung der Produkte der Antragsgegnerin mit einer Wort-/Bildmarke ändert daran nichts. Zudem liege eine Verwechslungsgefahr vor, da die Produkte in derselben Warenklasse angeboten werden, die Smiley-Form über eine durchschnittliche Kennzeichnungskraft verfügt und eine erhebliche Ähnlichkeit zwischen den Zeichen besteht. 

Final Decision

By rejecting the Respondent’s appeal, the judgment is now final. The Respondent remains prohibited from marketing smiley-shaped potato products.

Source: Press Release of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf dated December 19, 2024*

MORE NEWS

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.
Trademark Law

No protection for Jägermeister’s well–known figurative trade mark “Hirschkopf”

Even for well–known trademarks, protection under trade mark law is only possible in so far as the opposing signs have at least a certain similarity.

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

The Wiesbaden Regional Court held that advertising with outdated, significantly higher strike-through prices is misleading and violates the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the UWG. Consumers understand crossed-out prices as the most recently charged price; if the reference price does not reflect that and there is no clear explanation, the ad suggests an overstated discount. Therefore, strike-through prices must be tied to the price immediately charged before the reduction.
Trademark Law

“Bayern Bazi” Lacks Distinctiveness

The German Federal Patent Court upheld the refusal of the word mark “Bayern Bazi.” The combination of a geographical indication (“Bayern”) and a dialect term (“Bazi”) is perceived as a purely descriptive message (“particularly Bavarian/from Bavaria”), not as an indicator of commercial origin. Prior registrations did not help because the sign lacks a distinctive, imaginative character.
IP

Russian Sanctions: Intellectual Property Rights Also Affected

Article 12g of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine “No Russia Clause”
Trademark Law

Virtual Goods in the Spotlight – The General Court Issues a Landmark Ruling on Whether a Trademark for Virtual Goods Possesses Distinctive Character

Virtual Goods in the Spotlight – The General Court Issues a Landmark Ruling on Whether a Trademark for Virtual Goods Possesses Distinctive Character.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München