NEWS

Russian Sanctions: Intellectual Property Rights Also Affected

Annex XL of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014

 Contents

IP Rights Must Be Addressed in Licensing Agreements from 25 June 2025

Contracting Parties in Non-EU Third Countries

For contracts involving only companies established within the European Union, and where delivery obligations are to be fulfilled solely within the EU, there is – based on the wording of Article 12g of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (“to a third country”) – no obligation to include a No-Russia clause.

No-Russia Clause

Pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 12g, exporters must prohibit the re-export of certain goods to Russia and their re-export for use in Russia. These goods include items for the aerospace industry, jet fuel and fuel additives, firearms and other weapons, as well as so-called “High-Priority Items” such as integrated circuits, navigation devices, capacitors, certain plugs and sockets, transistors, and semiconductor components.

High-Priority Items

The High-Priority Items are listed in Annex XL of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 see:

When granting IP rights and know-how to partners in third countries, their use must be contractually prohibited in connection with High-Priority Items, if such use is directly or indirectly intended for sale, supply, transfer, or export to Russia or for use in Russia.

Suggested Wording

On 22 February 2024, the European Commission published explanatory notes in its FAQs regarding the No-Russia clause under the sanctions regime. These FAQs include a model clause that should be an integral part of the contract and is deemed to fulfil the requirements of Article 12g. Alternative formulations are possible.

See: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/document/download/7f54341b-2bf1-4142-b5d4-b1b09c93d03e_en?filename=faqs-sanctions-russia-no-re-export_en.pdf

 

To the point:

The No-Russia clause must be contractually agreed upon. A unilateral notice to the contracting partner does not satisfy the legal requirement.
MORE NEWS
Trademark Law

GPTO enables EU-wide protection of regional products – new rights for craft and industrial goods

DPMA enables protection of geographical indications for industrial products such as knives, porcelain & watches – new EU regulation now in force.
Copyright / Design Law

Copyright protection for utilitarian objects: same test as for other works

The CJEU has held that utilitarian objects and works of applied art are protected by copyright under the same originality standard as any other category of works. It rejects a stricter threshold for everyday objects and provides detailed guidance on how national courts must assess originality and infringement in this context.
Copyright

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

The Wiesbaden Regional Court held that advertising with outdated, significantly higher strike-through prices is misleading and violates the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the UWG. Consumers understand crossed-out prices as the most recently charged price; if the reference price does not reflect that and there is no clear explanation, the ad suggests an overstated discount. Therefore, strike-through prices must be tied to the price immediately charged before the reduction.
Trademark Law

No protection for Jägermeister’s well–known figurative trade mark “Hirschkopf”

Even for well–known trademarks, protection under trade mark law is only possible in so far as the opposing signs have at least a certain similarity.
Trademark Law

“Bayern Bazi” Lacks Distinctiveness

The German Federal Patent Court upheld the refusal of the word mark “Bayern Bazi.” The combination of a geographical indication (“Bayern”) and a dialect term (“Bazi”) is perceived as a purely descriptive message (“particularly Bavarian/from Bavaria”), not as an indicator of commercial origin. Prior registrations did not help because the sign lacks a distinctive, imaginative character.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München