NEWS

Birkenstock fails before the Higher Regional Court of Cologne in copyright dispute regarding “Arizona” and “Gizeh” sandals

OLG Cologne judgement of 26/01/2024, 6 U 89/23 – “Birkenstock”

 Contents

Sandal a work of applied art?

The plaintiff belongs to the Birkenstock group of companies and sells the following sandal models:

Birkenstock Urheberrecht
Birkenstock Arizona
Birkenstock Urheberrecht
Birkenstock Gizeh

The defendants operate an online shop that offers the following sandals:

In principle, sandals can be protected by copyright. Works that differ from pure art in terms of their purpose can enjoy protection as works of applied art pursuant to § 2 par. 1 No. 4 UrhG. The lower court ruled that the sandals were works of applied art within the meaning of § 2 par.1 No. 4 UrhG. The defendant appealed and won.

“Arizona” and “Gizeh” are no works under copyright law – but designs

Copyright protection can only be considered for the sandals if they have an aesthetic effect that is not due to its purpose but based on artistic freedom – so to what extent the object of use is artistically designed beyond its functional form.

It is a question of differentiating between design protected by design law for a maximum of 25 years and art protected by copyright for up to 70 years after the death of the creator.

Design and/ or work?

A design can also be protected by copyright, but it must fulfil the protection requirements for works of applied art. A work is the author’s own intellectual creation. The personality of the author must be reflected in the original – his free creative decision must be expressed.

The OLG clarifies that the long–lasting protection in copyright law is intended to do justice to the artist, who often waits a lifetime for this success. Product designs, on the other hand, are regularly amortized in shorter periods of time through industrial production and exploitation. Long–lasting protection would massively restrict competition for product innovations.

To the point

Not every utilization of an existing freedom of design justifies copyright protection. There are no clear criteria for distinguishing between works of applied art and designs. It must be carefully examined whether the object is an expression of artistic freedom.

more NEWS
Copyright

Hamburg Regional Court Decides: Creation of AI Training Datasets Does Not Infringe Copyright

In a groundbreaking judgment, the Hamburg Regional Court has decided that the creation of AI training datasets is permissible as text and data mining under § 60d of the German Copyright Act (UrhG). This decision is of great importance for the open-source community and the development of artificial intelligence (AI).
Trademark Law

Technical article brand protection in the metaverse

The essay “Brand Protection in the Metaverse” highlights the legal challenges and opportunities that Web 3.0 offers companies.
Copyright

Contrary opinion of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf and the Regional Court of Cologne regarding the production of photos of photo wallpapers and their publication.

The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf denies copyright infringement by taking and publishing photos of photo wallpapers - the Regional Court of Cologne is not sharing this view in its two most recent decisions.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München