NEWS

Artistic freedom outweighs rights of luxury handbag manufacturer Hermés

Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, Decision of September 19, 2023 – 2-06 O 532/23; 2-06 O 533/23

 Contents

Fashion label allowed to incorporate characteristic features of a luxury handbag

The Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main has ruled in a trademark dispute between the Berlin fashion label Namilia and luxury handbag manufacturer Hermés that the fashion label can adopt iconic features of the handbag in their creations. The court justified the decision by stating that engagement with a brand can be covered by artistic freedom.

Hermés objected to the performance at a fashion show

The fashion label Namilia presented fashion creations at a fashion show that were inspired by the luxury handbag from Hermés. These creations were promoted on the internet and social media. Hermés took legal action against the performances.

Artistic expression supersedes Hermés' property rights

The court ruled that these performances are covered by artistic freedom and that the “interest rooted in artistic freedom“ of the fashion label in the artistic expression of the fashion show outweighs Hermés’ property rights.

The court argued that the brand is not denigrated or diminished, but instead serves as a socially desired reference point for luxury goods. The association with the luxury handbag is only one part of the overall staging and does not constitute trademark infringement.

To the point

The decision emphasizes that engagement with a brand can be protected under artistic freedom. This ruling could have potential implications for future trademark disputes, particularly in the art and fashion industry, and could lead to further expansion of the protection of artistic freedom.

MORE NEWS
Trademark Law

BGH “Mehmet Efendi”: No exhaustion from placing goods on the market in Turkey – association agreement does not extend the EEA

The BGH confirms: Placing EU trade mark goods on the market in Turkey does not trigger exhaustion within the EEA. The EEC–Turkey association framework does not extend the territorial scope of exhaustion; parallel imports into the EEA can be prohibited without the proprietor’s consent.
Trademark Law

BGH “LA BIOSTHETIQUE”: German courts have jurisdiction for targeted online advertising – supplier disclosure may be disproportionate

The BGH aligns international jurisdiction for online trademark infringement with the target market: what matters is where the addressed consumers/traders are located—not the server location or the advertiser’s seat. It also held that disclosure of suppliers/prior owners may exceptionally be disproportionate where the infringement lies solely in the presentation of exhausted goods.
Trade Secrets

CJEU: Infringing “possession” covers stock held abroad—and also indirect possession

The CJEU clarifies that trade mark owners may prohibit “possession” under Art. 10(3)(b) Directive 2015/2436 even where goods are stocked in another Member State—if intended for offering/placing on the market in the protection state. “Possession” also includes indirect control (supervisory/managerial authority).
Trademark Law

General Court: “Eco” may still shape the overall impression despite being descriptive

The General Court clarifies that descriptive elements can still matter in the comparison of signs—especially when placed at the beginning and drawing attention due to their length/position.
AI / Personality Rights

LG Hamburg: AI-generated X post remains attributable to the account operator

The Regional Court of Hamburg held that a continuing defamatory false statement on X remains unlawful under the law of statements even if the post was generated by AI. The account operator can be held responsible for the published content.
AI

Cologne Higher Regional Court: Meta may provisionally use public Facebook and Instagram data for AI training

The Cologne Higher Regional Court rejected an interim injunction against Meta’s announced use of publicly shared Facebook and Instagram data for AI training. In its summary assessment, the court considered the processing likely lawful, in particular on the basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München