NEWS

Misleading advertising with “climate neutral”

OLG Düsseldorf of 06.07.2023 – 20 U 152/22 also tastes good for the climate

 Contents

Information obligations for advertising with the term "climate neutral"

A confectionery manufacturer had printed on its product packaging since 2021 xxx produces all products climate neutral” and the certificate “climate neutral product ClimatePartner.com”. The plaintiff was of the opinion that this advertising was misleading, as consumers understand the information as an indication of an emission-free manufacturing process.

CO2 balance

The claim was dismissed as the court was of the opinion that the term “climate neutral” is not necessarily understood in the sense of an emission-free manufacturing process, but in the sense of a balanced carbon footprint.. If a company takes measures to avoid CO2 or (also) carries out offsetting measures, advertising with “climate neutral” can be considered.

Climate neutral with certificates

However, consumers do not assume that the company achieves climate neutrality solely by purchasing emissions certificates or through third-party offsetting measures. From the consumer’s point of view, companies that do not implement effective measures to reduce emissions themselves are suspected of “greenwashing”. Consumers must therefore be informed about the exact way in which climate neutrality is achieved.

Accessible information

The additional information must be provided in the advert itself or in the immediate vicinity of the advert; a statement “Climate neutrality is also achieved through offsetting”, combined with a QR code or an easily accessible website on the product, may be sufficient to provide the required information. The information provided must be easily accessible and understandable.

At the point

This judgment clarifies the advertiser’s duty to inform consumers. Anyone advertising with the term “climate neutral” must explain why the product is labeled as “climate neutral”, either due to their own savings measures or (only) through offsetting. Jurisdiction regarding the “climate neutral” is not finalized. It is still unclear whether advertising with “climate neutral” is permissible if the company does not make any own efforts to reduce its CO2 emissions.

MORE NEWS
Trademark Law

AI & Branding: Europe’s brand work between “back to basics” and a GenAI leap

European marketing teams are putting branding back at the top for 2026—while GenAI is still rarely scaled broadly. At the same time, DPMA/EUIPO figures show sustained trademark activity.
Trademark Law

German Federal Court of Justice: No title protection for names of fictional film characters without an independent “life” – “Moneypenny”

The BGH clarifies: A fictional character’s name may in principle enjoy title protection—but only if the character itself is perceived as an independently “designatable” work (part) under trademark law. For “Moneypenny”, the court found insufficient individualisation and no sufficient detachment from the underlying work.
Trademark Law

GPTO enables EU-wide protection of regional products – new rights for craft and industrial goods

DPMA enables protection of geographical indications for industrial products such as knives, porcelain & watches – new EU regulation now in force.
Copyright / Design Law

Copyright protection for utilitarian objects: same test as for other works

The CJEU has held that utilitarian objects and works of applied art are protected by copyright under the same originality standard as any other category of works. It rejects a stricter threshold for everyday objects and provides detailed guidance on how national courts must assess originality and infringement in this context.
Copyright

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

The Wiesbaden Regional Court held that advertising with outdated, significantly higher strike-through prices is misleading and violates the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the UWG. Consumers understand crossed-out prices as the most recently charged price; if the reference price does not reflect that and there is no clear explanation, the ad suggests an overstated discount. Therefore, strike-through prices must be tied to the price immediately charged before the reduction.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München