NEWS

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

Regional Court Wiesbaden, judgment of 24 Apr 2025, 11 O 1/25 – Misrepresentation through an inaccurate reference price

 Contents

Background

An online retailer for model cars advertised discounts using strikethrough “reference prices.” These were not the most recent selling prices but amounts charged many months earlier (e.g., €72.95). In fact, the product had been offered weeks before for €39.00 and at times even for €31.20.

Decision

The court held the pricing display to be misleading, constituting an infringement of the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the unfair-commercial-practices rules under the UWG. Referencing an outdated, higher price suggests a greater discount than actually granted.

Court’s Reasoning: The strikethrough price must reflect the most recent price

Consumers reasonably interpret a crossed-out price as the previous selling price. A reference price that was not charged immediately before the price reduction misrepresents the actual savings.

  • The advertised €72.95 was not the last price charged.
  • Immediately prior to the promotional prices (€31.20 / €39.00), the retailer had not advertised €72.95.
  • Absent clarification, consumers may assume the strikethrough price equals the most recent price — which was incorrect here.

To the point

Strike-through prices must reflect the most recently charged price – outdated reference prices are misleading and violate German pricing law (PAngV/UWG

Case No.: District Court of Wiesbaden 11 O 1/25

Source: https://www.dr-bahr.com/news/werbung-mit-veraltetem-streichpreis-in-online-shop-ist-irrefuehrend.html

MORE NEWS

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.
Trademark Law

No protection for Jägermeister’s well–known figurative trade mark “Hirschkopf”

Even for well–known trademarks, protection under trade mark law is only possible in so far as the opposing signs have at least a certain similarity.
Trademark Law

“Bayern Bazi” Lacks Distinctiveness

The German Federal Patent Court upheld the refusal of the word mark “Bayern Bazi.” The combination of a geographical indication (“Bayern”) and a dialect term (“Bazi”) is perceived as a purely descriptive message (“particularly Bavarian/from Bavaria”), not as an indicator of commercial origin. Prior registrations did not help because the sign lacks a distinctive, imaginative character.
IP

Russian Sanctions: Intellectual Property Rights Also Affected

Article 12g of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine “No Russia Clause”
Trademark Law

Virtual Goods in the Spotlight – The General Court Issues a Landmark Ruling on Whether a Trademark for Virtual Goods Possesses Distinctive Character

Virtual Goods in the Spotlight – The General Court Issues a Landmark Ruling on Whether a Trademark for Virtual Goods Possesses Distinctive Character.
Trademark Law

Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf Confirms Legal Protection for McCain’s Smiley-Shaped Potato Products

Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf Confirms Legal Protection for McCain’s Smiley-Shaped Potato Products

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München