NEWS

SimonGraeser Achieves Significant Victory for Authors’ Rights – Successful Damages Claim on Behalf of a Professional Photographer against Süddeutsche Zeitung for Failure to Credit Authorship

Munich District Court, Judgment of 24.08.2023 – 161 C 825/23

 Contents

A professional photographer, well-known in the sports and travel industry, took legal action against Süddeutsche Zeitung for using one of his photographs without crediting him as the author. The use occurred in both the print and online editions. After an out-of-court settlement respecting our client’s rights could not be reached, our client had to enforce his rights through litigation – successfully.

High Importance of the Right to be Credited as an Author

The Munich District Court ruled that Süddeutsche Zeitung had acquired the rights to the said photograph from a big image agency, but had violated the plaintiff’s right to recognition of his authorship by failing to credit him. The court clarified that our client had neither waived his right to be credited as an author nor was there any industry practice that would preclude such crediting. Furthermore, the court emphasized that a permanent and irrevocable waiver of the right to be credited as an author is not readily possible due to the close link of this right with the right to personal integrity in authorship.

High Standard of Care in the Use of Copyright-Protected Images

The court made it clear that every user of a copyright-protected photograph must ensure that the author’s right to personal integrity is respected. In this case, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH had trusted that image source attribution would suffice with only the mention of the image agency. However, this reliance was negligent. The court states that there is a high standard of care in copyright law, for which every user of a copyright-protected image is responsible.

Damages Awarded in Favour of the Professional Photographer

Due to the violation of the right to personal integrity in authorship, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH was ordered to pay damages to our client.

To the point

This judgment underscores that the user of a copyright-protected photograph cannot transfer the responsibility for complying with the right to personal integrity in authorship to others. Anyone who uses a copyright-protected photograph is responsible for their handling of it and must bear the consequences in case of a violation.

MORE NEWS
AI / Trademark Law

AI-driven trademark abuse: Why “register first, use later” is becoming riskier

AI tools make it easier to identify unprotected brand names. For businesses, this can quickly become costly on platforms such as Amazon.

Munich Regional Court I: Google must answer for false AI responses

Munich Regional Court I prohibited Google from further disseminating false statements from an “AI Overview”. The AI response was attributed to the search engine operator as its own statement.
Trademark Law

BGH “Mehmet Efendi”: No exhaustion from placing goods on the market in Turkey – association agreement does not extend the EEA

The BGH confirms: Placing EU trade mark goods on the market in Turkey does not trigger exhaustion within the EEA. The EEC–Turkey association framework does not extend the territorial scope of exhaustion; parallel imports into the EEA can be prohibited without the proprietor’s consent.
Trademark Law

BGH “LA BIOSTHETIQUE”: German courts have jurisdiction for targeted online advertising – supplier disclosure may be disproportionate

The BGH aligns international jurisdiction for online trademark infringement with the target market: what matters is where the addressed consumers/traders are located—not the server location or the advertiser’s seat. It also held that disclosure of suppliers/prior owners may exceptionally be disproportionate where the infringement lies solely in the presentation of exhausted goods.
Trade Secrets

CJEU: Infringing “possession” covers stock held abroad—and also indirect possession

The CJEU clarifies that trade mark owners may prohibit “possession” under Art. 10(3)(b) Directive 2015/2436 even where goods are stocked in another Member State—if intended for offering/placing on the market in the protection state. “Possession” also includes indirect control (supervisory/managerial authority).
Trademark Law

General Court: “Eco” may still shape the overall impression despite being descriptive

The General Court clarifies that descriptive elements can still matter in the comparison of signs—especially when placed at the beginning and drawing attention due to their length/position.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München