NEWS

Berlin Court of Appeal (KG) decides on the copyright permissibility of framing and the limit of Section 50 of the German Copyright Law (press privilege)

KG Berlin judgment of 18.09.2023 - 24 U 110/22 - Framing in the context of current events permissible under copyright law (“Lindner photo”)

 Contents

What does framing mean?

Framing is a web design technique in which the content of a website is divided into several areas or “frames”. In this frame, another website’s content can be displayed via a clickable link. It is therefore a method of presenting links or links to external websites within your own website.

Facts of the case

The plaintiff is a photo agency that held the rights of use to the photos showing the FDP politician Christian Lindner. The photos in dispute dealt with a violation by Christian Lindner of the coronavirus rules in force at the time. These photos were published without permission on X (formerly Twitter) by a third party. The defendant, a public television station, used the photos on its website by framing them. The rights holder considered this type of integration (framing) to be a copyright infringement and filed an action for injunctive relief.

Decision of the KG Berlin

The KG Berlin dismissed the action as the actions of the public television broadcaster were permitted by the statutory limit of Section 50 of the German Copyright Act (reporting on current events). According to the judges, the framing was necessary, appropriate and proportionate, as the reporting concerned the corona rules in force at the time and any violations by politicians. The balancing of interests showed that freedom of expression and freedom of the press (Art. 5 (I) 1 and 2 German Constitution (GG)) took precedence, so that the exclusive right of communication to the public protected by the plaintiff under Art. 14 I GG had to take a back seat.

To the point

The framing of the public broadcaster was permissible here under the so-called press privilege Section 50 of the German Copyright Act (reporting on daily events, so-called press privilege). However, the judgment of the KG does not provide a practicable or generally applicable solution for the framing of links. However, there is a ray of hope: With the new Copyright Service Provider Act (UrhDaG), links by public broadcasters to content on platform X could become largely unobjectionable, provided that they are considered non-commercial.

MORE NEWS
Trademark Law

AI & Branding: Europe’s brand work between “back to basics” and a GenAI leap

European marketing teams are putting branding back at the top for 2026—while GenAI is still rarely scaled broadly. At the same time, DPMA/EUIPO figures show sustained trademark activity.
Trademark Law

German Federal Court of Justice: No title protection for names of fictional film characters without an independent “life” – “Moneypenny”

The BGH clarifies: A fictional character’s name may in principle enjoy title protection—but only if the character itself is perceived as an independently “designatable” work (part) under trademark law. For “Moneypenny”, the court found insufficient individualisation and no sufficient detachment from the underlying work.
Trademark Law

GPTO enables EU-wide protection of regional products – new rights for craft and industrial goods

DPMA enables protection of geographical indications for industrial products such as knives, porcelain & watches – new EU regulation now in force.
Copyright / Design Law

Copyright protection for utilitarian objects: same test as for other works

The CJEU has held that utilitarian objects and works of applied art are protected by copyright under the same originality standard as any other category of works. It rejects a stricter threshold for everyday objects and provides detailed guidance on how national courts must assess originality and infringement in this context.
Copyright

Memorisation of AI training data infringes copyright

The Regional Court of Munich I has held that the memorisation of copyrighted training data in OpenAI’s GPT models infringes copyright. The judgment reshapes the legal framework for AI training and highlights key compliance risks for AI providers, rightsholders and companies using generative AI.

Using an outdated strikethrough price is misleading

The Wiesbaden Regional Court held that advertising with outdated, significantly higher strike-through prices is misleading and violates the German Price Indication Ordinance (PAngV) in conjunction with the UWG. Consumers understand crossed-out prices as the most recently charged price; if the reference price does not reflect that and there is no clear explanation, the ad suggests an overstated discount. Therefore, strike-through prices must be tied to the price immediately charged before the reduction.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München