NEWS

Registered trade mark FlipFlop cancelled

OLG Zweibrücken of 02.03.2022 – 4U63/21 FlipFlop

 Contents

Sign FlipFlop

Everyone knows the trade mark “FlipFlop” for toe separator sandals. A recent judgement by the Higher Regional Court in Zweibrücken/ Germany will not change this. But as a result of the judgement, the sign “FlipFlop” loses its protection as a registered trademark.

Cancellation application by Havaianas

The suppliers of toe separator sandals labelled “Havaianas” requested to cancel the German word mark “FlipFlop”, which was registered in 1997 (including in class 25 for “footwear”). They argued that the sign “FlipFlop” is a purely descriptive indication of goods and is no longer perceived as an indication of a company.

Distinctive character

A trade mark must be distinctive in order to fulfill its function as an indication of origin, namely to distinguish the goods/services of one company from those of another. If it loses this function because it has become a common term for a product/service, a cancellation  can be request according to § 49 para. 2 no. 1 MarkenG. 

The Higher Regional Court in Zweibrücken granted the application for consent to cancellation. According to the survey of the public (retailers and consumers) carried out by the expert, the trade mark had become a common name for toe separator sandals / footwear. Only a completely insignificant proportion of the public considered the sign as indication of origin. According to the survey, only 14% of traders still associated the trade mark with the company, compared to around 4% of consumers.

Common name

The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf already addressed the question of whether “flip-flop” had become a common name for toe separator sandals in 2011. At that time, the answer was in the negative. The mere fact that “FlipFlop” was more frequently used as a term for thong sandals is not sufficient. In order to affirm the existence of a common name, it is necessary that only an insignificant part of the public understands it as a designation of origin.

At the point

The registered trade mark is a monopoly right that can represent a considerable value for the owner. It is essential that the owner protects his right and also takes action against use by unauthorised persons. Otherwise there is a risk of losing the right. Even if there are high requirements for the loss of the right, it is very important that trademarks are actively defended by the trade mark owner, in particular well-known trademarks.

more News

Competition Law

Deception of origin – misleading commercial practices

Wunderbräu not a climate-neutral beer brewed in Munich after all – beer bottle may no longer bear the Munich address and "CO2 positive” and “climate-neutral” according to the decision of Munich Regional Court I.
Trademark Law

3D trade marks and absolute grounds for

The General Court ruled in December that Lego minifigures are valid EU trade marks (EUTM).
Trademark Law

Invalidity of an EU trademark – Relevant public with regard to a language which is not an official language of the EU

Where a descriptive character of a trademark has to be assessed, the assessment depends on the relevant public. In the case of an EU trademark (EUTM), the language of the relevant public does not have to be an official language of the EU. It is only important that the language is understood and spoken by a relevant part of consumers in the EU.

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Phone +49 89 90 42 27 51-0
Fax +49 89 90 42 27 51-9

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin

Fachanwältin für
gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin

Fachanwältin für
gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München

Tel. +49 89 90 42 27 51-0
Fax +49 89 90 42 27 51-9