Misleading Advertising "Climate Neutral"

What You Need to Know

Sustainability has become a key selling point for many businesses. However, terms like “climate neutral” or “sustainable” are often vaguely defined and can quickly lead to misleading advertising. Consumers, competition authorities, and regulatory bodies are increasingly scrutinizing whether environmental claims in advertising align with reality.

Why Are Sustainability Claims in Advertising Problematic?

Consumers rely on corporate statements. If an advertisement creates the impression that a product or service is more sustainable than it actually is, this constitutes greenwashing.

Examples of Misleading "Climate Neutral" Advertising

  • Vague Terms: Claims such as “environmentally friendly” or “climate neutral” without verifiable evidence.
  • False Certifications: Use of unrecognized or misleading environmental labels.
  • Deceptive Offsetting: Companies claiming to be “climate neutral” without actually reducing emissionss


Industries most affected: food, fashion, and energy sectors.

Steps to Ensure Legally Compliant Sustainability Advertising

  • Use Clear Terms: Avoid ambiguous words like “green” or “sustainable” without precise definitions or proof.
  • Provide Transparent Evidence: If your company claims climate neutrality, CO₂ balances and reduction measures must be clearly disclosed.
  • Use Certifications Correctly: Only rely on recognized environmental labels and seals to substantiate your claims.
  • Avoid Greenwashing: Ensure your advertising does not suggest that a product is more sustainable than it actually is.

Legal Regulations for Misleading Climate Claims

Key regulations to consider:

  • § 5 UWG – Misleading Claims: Companies must not make false or misleading statements about their products.
  • EmpCo Directive (EU): Regulates the use of environmental claims and mandates clear evidence for climate neutrality.
  • Advertising with Environmental Claims: Only permitted if based on scientifically verifiable facts.


Link to: Misleading Advertising UWG

Case Studies: Legal Actions Against Misleading Environmental Advertising

  1. Case: Confectionery Manufacturer Katjes
    Katjes has advertised its products as climate neutral since 2021. However, its manufacturing process was not CO₂-neutral—emissions were merely offset through climate protection projects. The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled that “climate neutral” is an ambiguous term and that companies must transparently disclose how climate neutrality is achieved. Providing this information only via a QR code on the packaging was deemed insufficient.

    BGH: Katjes misleading advertising “climate neutral”

  2. Case: Discount Retailer Netto
    The German Environmental Aid Association (DUH) successfully sued Netto Marken-Discount for misleading advertising with the term “climate neutral” for its “Cafèt Latte Cappuccino” coffee product. The Regional Court of Amberg ruled that the advertising was unlawful because climate neutrality was solely based on purchasing carbon offset credits from short-lived forest projects. Netto withdrew its appeal and accepted the ruling.

    DUH vs. Netto misleading advertising “climate neutral”

  3. Case: Drugstore Chain dm
    Dm advertised products as “climate neutral” and “environmentally neutral” without adequately explaining how this neutrality was achieved. Following a lawsuit by DUH, dm withdrew its appeal and accepted the court’s ruling. The court determined that such claims were misleading if they lacked clear and transparent explanations.

    DUH vs. dm court case misleading advertising “climate neutral”

    These cases highlight that businesses must clearly and precisely communicate how the claimed climate neutrality is achieved to avoid legal consequences.


Link to: Misleading Advertising Examples – Food Industry

Further Information

Conclusion: Climate Neutral Advertising – Risk or Opportunity?

Sustainability advertising is a valuable tool to attract environmentally conscious consumers. However, false or vague claims can lead to serious legal consequences.

Our law firm helps you ensure legally compliant advertising, so your business can benefit from sustainability strategies without legal risks.

Contact us for an initial consultation.

FAQs

No, but companies must provide evidence to support this claim.

Warnings, fines, and, in severe cases, court-ordered bans on advertising.

Lassen Sie Ihre Werbung rechtlich prüfen, um Risiken zu vermeiden.

Honest communication about sustainability measures, verified climate neutrality strategies, and the use of official certifications.

Our Services

  • Individual consultation on unfair competition from your competitors
  • Individual consultation and review of the legality of your advertising
  • Drafting and defending against cease-and-desist letters
  • Conducting legal proceedings
  • Enforcing cease-and-desist, removal, and compensation claims in court
  • Negotiating amicable settlements with competitors

Karin Simon
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Susanne Graeser
Lawyer
Certified IP Lawyer

Uhlandstr. 2
80336 Munich
Germany

Karin Simon
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Susanne Graeser
Rechtsanwältin
Fachanwältin für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz

Uhlandstr. 2
D-80336 München